Surgical treatment and outcomes of acute and chronic ulcers on the penis following injection of foreign substances.

In this paper, we present our experience with acute and chronic penile ulcers resulting from injection of an exogenous substance and their surgical treatment.

Penile Strangulation: Analysis of Postextrication Follow-Up, Sequelae, and a Review of Literature.

Numerous case reports exist on penile strangulation injuries and extrication methods; however, the care and long-term consequences of penile strangulation injuries have been under-reported. Our aim is to investigate the long-term outcomes and sequalae following penile strangulation injuries. The PubMed Medline database was searched using the keyword string "penile strangulation," "penis strangulation," and "constriction" for all studies reporting outcomes of published penile strangulation injuries. Articles were evaluated for follow-up after strangulation injury, strangulating agent, extricating agent, and sequelae of injury. Fifty-six studies resulted with reports of 100 cases of penile strangulation and extrication from January 2000 to December 2019. The mean patient age was 41 (range: 3-86) years. Twenty-four (24/100) cases reported sequalae following extrication. Follow-up ranged from 2 weeks to 7 years with median follow-up time in the 7- to 12-month grouping. Metal rings comprised 36% (36/100) of strangulation agents and 50% of reported incidents were attributed to sexual activity. To our knowledge, this is the only study focusing on long-term outcomes after penile strangulation. This review provides a summary of 56 studies that document penile strangulation injuries over the last 20 years. Although a wide array of penile strangulation injuries have been documented in the literature, reports lack secondary management and long-term outcomes after removal of the strangulation device. We recommend that providers report long-term penile strangulation outcomes for future urologic evaluations after extrication.

Smile Incision-Modified Technique for Better Scrotal Outcome in Surgical Management of Penile Paraffinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Penile augmentation with foreign material injection is used to increase penile length, girth, or both. Most of these individuals develop complications due to an abnormal mass formation known as penile paraffinoma. Multiple surgical techniques for restoring penile function and correcting near-normal penile shape have been developed, but prior techniques have some post-operative complications. METHODS: We explained the smile incision-modified technique for penile paraffinoma reconstruction using illustrations to describe step-by-step procedures. This study aimed to describe our modified surgical technique for reconstruction to correct complications due to disastrous consequences of failed penile augmentation. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients aged 28-66 years (mean: 44.25 ± 2.63) were operated with a smile incision-modified technique from January 2017 until December 2020 in Semarang Dr. Kariadi tertiary hospital. There were no intraoperative complications observed. We found hematoma in 3 patients in a 1-week follow-up. After 2 weeks of post-operative surgery, all patients had no skin dehiscence or necrosis. Cosmetic appearance and functional improvement after reconstruction were acceptable by all patients. CONCLUSION: Penile paraffinoma reconstruction using the smile incision-modified technique was a feasible and effective technique to manage penile paraffinoma patients with good esthetic results and minor complications.

[A Case of Penile Calciphylaxis in a Hemodialysis Patient].

In the present case of a 56-year-old male, hemodialysis was introduced from December 20XX-2 due to chronic renal failure caused by diabetic nephropathy. In February 20XX, a glans penis ulcer was observed. It gradually expanded. Angiography conducted in April revealed complete occlusion of the left internal pudendal artery and poor visualization of the bilateral penile arteries. Given the high risk of obstruction, endovascular treatment was not conducted. The glans penis ulcer continued to expand, and maintenance dialysis became difficult due to intractable pain. Opioids were introduced, but the pain could not be controlled. In May 20XX, the patient was referred to our department for surgical treatment, and partial penile resection was performed. The patient was diagnosed with penile calciphylaxis based on clinical findings and pathological diagnosis. After the surgery, the pain subsided considerably, and the patient is being followed on an out-patient basis.

Subcoronal Incision for Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Does Not Risk Glans Necrosis.

PURPOSE: Glans vascular compromise had previously been considered a rare but devastating complication of the subcoronal incision for inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Here, we describe the largest series of subcoronal implants to date to assess contemporary complication rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of subcoronal prosthesis placements by a single surgeon from Seoul, South Korea, was performed. Patients were randomly assigned either Coloplast Titan or AMS 700 device per institutional practice. RESULTS: A total of 898 patients who underwent subcoronal implants from May 2015 to March 2022 were analyzed. Median follow-up was 41 months (IQR 40). Preoperative patient comorbidities included diabetes (36.6%) and Peyronie's disease (4%). The most common complication was transient distal penile edema (74.7%). Transient incisional paresthesia (20.6%) was more common in patients with diabetes (31.9% vs 13.9%, P < .01). Five cases (0.5%) of distal penile skin necrosis were reported in patients who had previously been circumcised. Of these, 3 were managed successfully with wet-to-dry dressing, 1 required skin grafting, and 1 required device explant. Device infection without incisional compromise occurred in 2 cases (0.2%). There were no instances of glans necrosis or ischemia observed in this cohort. Of the first-time implants (817, 90.9%), most (62.3%) were successfully completed under local anesthetic alone, with the remainder of surgeries completed with the addition of adjunctive conscious sedation. CONCLUSIONS: Subcoronal incision for first-time or revision penile implant surgery is not a risk factor for glans ischemia or necrosis and can be safely completed under local anesthetic with or without conscious sedation.

Surgical management of acquired buried penis and scrotal lymphedema: A retrospective review.

Acquired buried penis is a condition that can have detrimental physical and psychological consequences for patients. Factors such as elevated BMI, chronic scrotal lymphedema, hidradenitis suppurativa, and chronic inflammation can lead to the condition. Surgical intervention is the treatment of choice for advanced disease. Following IRB approval, a retrospective chart review was performed for patients with a diagnosis of acquired buried penis who required surgical intervention. Details of patient history, surgical management including intraoperative and post-operative photography, and complications were reviewed. Seven patient cases were reviewed. The average age at time of surgery was 44 with a mean weight of 344 pounds and an average BMI of 48. Severe scrotal lymphedema and hidradenitis were common concurrent comorbidities. Concurrent scrotoplasty and infraumbilical panniculectomy were standard parts of the operations. Native glans skin was salvageable in all but one case. Penile shaft skin was reconstructed with skin grafts or adjacent tissue transfer. 88% of the cases had some element of wound dehiscence post-operatively. Surgical management of an acquired buried penis can be challenging. The patient demographic with the disease is frequently complicated by morbid obesity, concurrent lymphedema, or hidradenitis. Post-operative complications are expected. The surgical techniques presented can aid in simplifying the management of this challenging surgical population.

Penile calciphylaxis in a patient with concurrent haemodialysis and Coumadin treatment.

A man in his 30s, with a medical history of end-stage renal disease on haemodialysis three times a week after kidney transplant rejection, anaemia of inflammatory disease, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidaemia, subtotal parathyroidectomy and aortic valve replacement on Coumadin treatment, presented to our institution with glans penis pain. Examination of the penis revealed a painful black eschar with ulceration on the glans penis with surrounding erythema. CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis and penile Doppler ultrasound revealed calcifications of the abdominal, pelvic and penile blood vessels. He was diagnosed with penile calciphylaxis, a very rare manifestation of calciphylaxis characterised by penile blood vessel calcification leading to occlusion, ischaemia and necrosis. Treatment with low calcium dialysate and sodium thiosulfate was initiated with haemodialysis. Five days after the treatment started, the patient's symptoms improved.

Timing and causative organisms associated with modern inflatable penile prosthesis infection: an institutional retrospective.

BACKGROUND: The advent of antibiotic-coated devices has reduced the rate of inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) infections; however, this may have altered microbial profiles when infections do occur. AIM: To describe the timing and causative organisms behind infection of infection retardant-coated IPPs in the context of our institution's perioperative antimicrobial protocols. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients undergoing IPP placement at our institution from January 2014 to January 2022. In all patients, perioperative antibiotic administration was congruent with American Urological Association guidelines. Boston Scientific devices are impregnated with InhibiZone (rifampin and minocycline), and all Coloplast devices were soaked in rifampin and gentamicin. Intraoperative irrigation was performed with betadine 5% irrigation prior to November 2016 and with vancomycin-gentamicin solution afterward. Cases involving prosthesis infection were identified, and variables were extracted from the medical record. Descriptive and comparative statistics were tabulated to identify clinical characteristics, including patient comorbidities, prophylaxis regimen, symptom onset, and intraoperative culture result. We previously reported an increased infection risk with Betadine irrigation and stratified results accordingly. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was time to infectious symptoms, while the secondary outcome was description of device cultures at the time of explantation. RESULTS: A total of 1071 patients underwent IPP placement over 8 years with an overall infection rate of 2.6% (28/1071). After discontinuation of Betadine, the overall infection rate was significantly lower at 0.9% (8/919) with a relative risk of 16.9 with Betadine (P < .0001). Primary procedures represented 46.4% (13/28). Of 28 patients with infection, only 1 had no identified risk factors; the remainder included Betadine at 71% (20/28), revision/salvage procedure at 53.6% (15/28), and diabetes at 50% (14/28). Median time to symptoms was 36 days (IQR, 26-52); almost 30% of patients had systemic symptoms. Organisms with high virulence, or ability to cause disease, were found in 90.5% (19/21) of positive cultures. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Our study revealed a median time to symptoms of just over 1 month. Risk factors for infection were Betadine 5% irrigation, diabetes, and revision/salvage cases. Over 90% causative organisms were virulent, demonstrating a microbial profile trend since antibiotic coating development. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: The large prospectively maintained database is a strength along with the ability to follow specific changes in perioperative protocols. The retrospective nature of the study is a limitation as well as the low infection rate, which limits certain subanalyses from being performed. CONCLUSION: IPP infections present in a delayed manner despite the rising virulence of infecting organisms. These findings highlight areas for improvement in perioperative protocols in the contemporary prosthetics era.

An unusual presentation of penile Mondor's disease in an HIV-positive patient.

Penile Mondor's disease (PMD), or thrombosis of the dorsal vein, is an under-reported benign condition. Its aetiology is poorly understood. Clinically, it presents as a palpable cord in the dorsal vein of the penis, with pain or local discomfort, especially during erection. PMD may be diagnosed based on the medical history and physical examination. Management of the condition is conservative, with practitioners opting for various strategies including sexual/masturbatory abstinence, localised anticoagulant topical therapy and oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. In many cases, PMD will resolve within 4-8 weeks of presentation. Thrombectomy and resection of the superficial penile vein are applied surgically in patients refractory to the medical treatment. We describe the case of a 33-year-old patient known to have HIV who presented for severe painful dorsal induration and swelling of the proximal third of the penis. The patient had no recent history of sexual intercourse, penile trauma or other well-known risk factors for PMD. The physical examination was unequivocal, so a Doppler ultrasound was performed. A diagnosis of PMD was made and conservative treatment was prescribed. During a follow-up visit after 6 weeks, the patient had no symptoms and physical examination did not reveal anything pathological.

Long term complications of penile fracture repair: Erectile dysfunction and penile curvature.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors that cause erectile dysfunction and penile curvature after repair of penile fracture (PF). METHODS: Data from 25 patients who underwent PF repair was retrospectively analyzed. PF was diagnosed by examining patients' medical histories and performing physical examinations. All patients underwent immediate PF repair. All patients filled out the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) form and penile curvature was examined. RESULTS: The median age of patients at the time of surgery and the median follow-up duration were 46 years (22-60 years) and 95 months (12-156 months), respectively. Two of the patients had concomitant urethral injury. At the final follow up, erectile dysfunction (ED) was present in 13 patients (52%). Among these patients, 9 patients (36%) had mild ED and 4 patients (16%) had moderate ED. With a univariate analysis, age and penile curvature were significantly associated with ED (p=0.008 and p=0.039, respectively). With a multivariate analysis, age was independently associated with ED (p=0.048, odds ratio=1.104, 95% confidence interval 1.000-1.218). The IIEF-5 scores correlated with age (p=0.009, r=0.510). Seven patients (28%) had penile curvature and one patient underwent penile plication surgery. CONCLUSION: After PF repair, age is the only risk factor for ED and penile curvature rarely requires surgical treatment.

Prevention of Penile Prosthesis Infection.

INTRODUCTION: Management protocols for treatment of severe erectile dysfunction have changed little in the last 20 years. Most algorithms consider penile prostheses as the last option of treatment in patients who have failed medical management. Despite multiple advances in current devices, prosthetic infection remains the most feared complication by implanting surgeons and patients. This report tries to make a compilation of the factors that can be impacted to prevent penile implant infections, and to make penile implantation a safer and more reliable way to solve an erection deficit. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: List events related to the surgical act (pre-operative, intra-operative, and post-operative) that are related to the risk of infection to contextualize possible actions/measures used to avoid prosthetic infection. RECENT FINDINGS: The impact of coated implants on reduction of infection rates. The recommendation to use chlorhexidine-based solutions over iodine solution for preoperative skin preps. Appears to be no difference in infection rates according to the approach chosen by the surgeon (infrapubic vs penoscrotal). The change in the microbial colonies that are colonizing implants in recent years are dramatic. Lack of evidence of which solutions to use for salvage or revision washout surgery: Chemical eradication or mechanical lavage cleansing?. Despite the importance of metabolic control in the literature, there is a disparity in exact glycemic values ​prior to the intervention in our literature. Factors such as preparation of the operative site, presence of comorbidities or previous surgeries, surgical time, or additional maneuvers during surgery can negatively impact the final result of penile prosthetic surgery.

Penile calciphylaxis in a patient with end-stage renal disease and chronic hemodialysis: a case report.

Penile calciphylaxis is a rare and highly morbid condition mainly affecting diabetic patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). It is characterized by ischemic skin ulceration and necrosis secondary to dystrophic calcification of the subcutaneous penile tissue and penile arterioles. We report a 52-year-old male with a 6-year history of diabetes mellitus and CRF on hemodialysis, who presented with a painful penile necrotic lesion in the last three weeks. He firstly treated with medical treatment, which was failed. Then underwent total penectomy. The histopathology result confirmed the diagnosis of penile calciphylaxis. Unfortunately, he passed away due to septic shock and multisystem organ failure ten days after surgery. In conclusion, the diagnosis of penile calciphylaxis must be evoked in the presence of any minimal necrotic penile lesion in a patient with CRF; this will initiate quick medical and/or minimally invasive surgical treatment to improve the patient's prognosis and avoid serious complications.

Penile fracture: Tertiary care center experience and long-term complications after immediate repair.

BACKGROUND: In the literature, there is not sufficient data on factors affecting the development of complications in patients with penile fracture after early surgical intervention. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the predictors of long-term complications in patients who underwent immediate surgical repair for penile fracture. MATERIALS/METHODS: This clinical study included a total of 31 cases of penile fracture in which surgical treatment was performed within the first 24 h and penile fracture was confirmed during the operation. The patients with and without late complications were compared in terms of parameters such as age, tear size of the tunica albuginea of the penis, bilateral involvement of the corpora cavernosa involvement, urethral injuries, and duration from penile fracture to surgery. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 42 years (interquartile range: 34-51 years). The median time from penile fracture to surgery was 13 h (8-18 h). The median tear size was 16 mm (11-21 mm). Late complications were seen in 13 (41.9%) patients in the post-operative period. Erectile dysfunction developed in five (16.1%) patients in the post-operative period. There was no statistically significant relationship between age, tear size, time from penile fracture to surgery, and bilateral corporeal involvement in terms of erectile dysfunction development. Painful erections, penile deviations, urethral strictures, tunical scars, and re-fracture were the other late complications. There was a significant relationship between the development of any complication and time from penile fracture to surgery (p = 0.028) and tear size (p = 0.031). In the receiver operating characteristic analysis of complication development, the cut-off value for the time from penile fracture to surgery was 13.5 h. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: We found that the longer time interval between penile fracture and surgery worsened the patient outcomes. In addition, tear size was determined to be a predictor for long-term complications. In our opinion, early treatment of penile fracture can prevent severe complications in these cases.